BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
March 13, 2003, Chattanooga, Tennessee
The meeting was called to order by President Barney
Fleming at 6:10 p.m. Also present were,
Dane Frazier, Stephanie Teeter, Louise Riedel, Susan Kasemeyer, Becky Hart,
Vonita Bowers, Dean Jackson, Stan
Eichelberger, Duane Barnett, Margie Burton, Randy Eiland, Jan Jeffers, Mike
Maul, Connie Caudill, Patti Pizzo, Jan Stevens, Gail Williams, Terry Woolley
Howe, Roger Taylor, John Parke, Mike
Tomlinson, and Executive Director, Kathleen Henkel. Absent were Maggy Price,
Maryben Stover, and Jim Baldwin.
The president thanked the office, convention
committee for the hard work throughout the year to make the convention a
success. As outgoing president, B.
Fleming presented each board member with a thank you gift. Ground rules were handed out that will
govern the meeting.
B. Fleming entertained a motion to excuse Maggy
Price from the meeting, seconded by R. Taylor.
Motion carried. T. Woolley Howe moved to excuse Maryben Stover and Jim
Baldwin from the meeting, seconded by M. Maul.
Motion carried.
Secretary’s
Report: Secretary J. Jeffers made
additions/deletions to the minutes of the August 23-24, 2003 midyear meeting.
S. Kasemeyer moved to approve the BOD minutes from the Salt Lake City
meeting. Motion carried. T. Woolley Howe moved to accept the
Executive Committee minutes of January 8, 2003 and February 6, 2003. Motion
carried.
World Endurance
Update: D.
Frazier gave an updated report from the FEI Endurance Committee. Endurance now has the second highest number
of FEI events the world, second only to jumping. Countries that have recently started endurance programs are Costa
Rica, Brazil, Chili, Argentina, Paraguay, Mongolia, India and Namibia. In the coming year or two, endurance will be
part of the Asian Games and will be part of the Central American Games in South
America. Brazil has more FEI endurance
competitions than any other country.
This past year at the World Equestrian Games International Endurance was
marred by the death of two horses. A
meeting was held in Paris last month where a seven member veterinary committee
to the FEI Endurance Committee was formed.
The U.S. representative will be Dr. Nancy Elliott. The United States has
been very effective in representing our point of view for endurance. The reason it has been so is that we have
had an excellent relationship with the allied organizations that we need to
represent us to the FEI. The people who
serve on that do so with the best interests of American Endurance and do not
serve their own personal agenda.
National Office
Report: K.
Henkel reported that Candi is leaving the end of May. Amy will be taking over Candi’s job. Judy is handling membership.
Troy will fill in between issues doing the ride results. T. Woolley Howe
reported that the office will start maintaining a list of riders who still have
a balance outstanding (bounced check) with ride managers. The ride manager can call the office for a
list of those riders. This is a service
the office will provide to ride managers who wish to use it. An article will be put in the Endurance News
so ride managers will know this is an available service.
National
Championship: D.
Fruth passed out copies of what the committee has been doing for the last six months;
i.e., questionnaire to ride managers regarding future ride sites, copy of
budget from 2002 NC. A binder has been
compiled for the 2001, 2002 and 2003 National Championship Rides. The binder will be kept in the office.
T.
Woolley Howe moved, “That AERC contribute funds necessary to cover the costs of
the veterinary staff at the National Championship Ride. These costs will
include vet salaries, housing, travel and meals. These costs will include vet fees, travel expenses established by
the vet committee (approximately $750 per vet); a per diem of $50 per day per
vet for housing and meals. AERC will
also waive the rider fees including the drug fees normally due AERC. Total out of pocket expenses from AERC for
the above vet costs not to exceed $7,500.” Seconded by R. Taylor. T. Woolley-Howe recommended that it be budgeted for this year. It would be a new budget item;
currently not budgeted. D. Frazier
asked what other support is provided by AERC.
AERC currently contributes $2,700 for awards and $2,976 (based on an ad
for each month) for advertising.
Finance Committee does not support the above motion. Motion carried.
Trails Committee: J. Fruth gave a report on the
aquisition of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) from the Recreation of Land
Use Committee out of the American Horse Council in Washington, D.C. The MOU is renewed every five years. This lays out our working relationship with
the Forest Service. The Forest Service
was chosen because other land management agencies pretty well follow the lead
of the Forest Service. We are now working with BLM and the National Parks. There has been one case where this MOU has
already been taken to a State Land Agency successfully.
J. Fruth gave a report on the Ft. Stanton Project in
New Mexico headed by R. Taylor and how well received it has been. One of the things coming out of this project
is that R. Taylor has been asked to go to Arizona and work with the BLM on a
project there. The significance of this
is that our objective here is for us to be able to work with BLM in that
national monument in Arizona, and if successful other national monuments will
open again to horses. J. Fruth also explained about T21 funding - horses are not mentioned in T21 funding. The Trails Committee this year will have an
opportunity before Congress to get horses written into the T21 funding. J. Fruth also reported that a manual on
maintaining trails (how you build them and how you maintain them) is being put
together for the Highway Administration and all the other land agencies in
Washington, D.C. One of the policy
issues covered was regarding competitive trail and endurance riders and how
land managers should govern our sport.
The committee was instrumental in eliminating this policy in the
proposed manual. J. Fruth reported
on EnviroHorse projects. They are going back and taking a look at
everything that is being published that affects our trails and identifying what
is scientifically based and what does not.
The Trails Committee has decided to create another slot on the committee
of Trail Historian and that will be filled by Jim Barnett. He has experience with historical trails and
will work with people from around the country who know where historic trails
are and identify, map and document these trails.
J. Fruth made a motion coming out of the Trails
Committees as follows: “The AERC shall establish a policy whereby every effort
shall be made to secure conservation easements for the establishment of its own
trail systems through out the United States.”
The general consensus of the Board was that the motion was too general
and had liability issues. J. Fruth withdrew the motion. It will go back to committee.
J. Fruth made a motion coming out of the Trails
Committee as follows: “The Trails
Committee is proposing that a ‘project trails fund’ be established whereby
those funds donated will be placed strictly in the ‘project trails fund.’ And any unused funds set aside into the
regular trails fund shall be deposited into the project trails fund at the end
of each fiscal year for the future use of special trails projects.” J. Fruth
explained how this project trails fund would work. T. Woolley Howe stated this fund is already established and that
the funds are not co-mingled with the general fund. After discussion the motion
was withdrawn.
(Meeting turned over the Vice President, S. Teeter.)
Research Donation: B. Fleming made a motion as
follows: “It is moved that this board
accept a donation of $8000.00 from a donor who will make the donation provided
it be used for the acquisition and analysis of the data accumulated through the
Pride Project. First, $6500.00 to be dispersed to Barney Fleming DVM for
the right to use the data collected by him for the benefit of AERC and its
members. Second, $1000.00 will be paid for the analysis and conclusion of
the data and third, $500.00 be used to defray cost of publishing the results
for the membership. Dr. Fleming will retain a non-exclusive right to use
the data for further research and publishing. “ Seconded by T. Woolley Howe. This
motion went through the Veterinary Committee, Finance Committee, Office, Legal,
and Sponsorship. Effective date is
immediately. The donor will not have
the funds available until April. Impact
on the office would be about an hour to disperse the funds and editorial time
for publishing the results and financial impact to AERC is none. At the suggestion of V. Rutter, B. Fleming
presented a letter from AERC’s accountant stating the effect that this would
have on AERC as a 5013C. S. Garlinghouse and S. Wickler will be doing the
analysis. Motion carries. J. Parke and
B. Fleming abstained.
(Meeting
turned back over to the President, B. Fleming.)
Ride Insurance Update: R. Taylor gave an insurance proposal presentation. This proposal
came out of the midyear meeting. All
sanctioned rides must have insurance and a certificate sent to AERC before the
ride naming AERC as an additional insured.
R. Taylor had several proposals submitted for ride insurance. West Coast Equine’s proposal was the most
competitive. The details were explained
of this policy. AERC would purchase the
policy and sell to ride managers who wanted to purchase this insurance. The
sanction form will have to be modified (paper copy as well as on line). Some clubs have their own ride insurance and
will not choose to take AERC insurance.
R. Taylor asked to have more discussion at the Ride Managers Meeting and
then vote on the motions at Sunday’s meeting.
(Dinner
break at 7:45 p.m.) (Workshop led by J. Parke.
Time: 8:00 – 8:30 p.m.)
Meeting
called to order by B. Fleming at 8:33 p.m.
Discussion
continued regarding purchase by AERC of ride insurance for ride managers. T. Woolley Howe’s concern is that AERC will
have to make up the additional cost of the policy for the rides that do not use
AERC insurance. Most ride managers now use either Equisure or Creelman, a small
group that use Markel. D. Frazier
stated that every two or three years this subject has come up about doing the
membership a service by purchasing a policy; however, it is for most ride
managers more expensive than what they have now. D. Frazier also wanted to know how much work will it be on the
office to track this. K. Henkel stated
that she did not know how much extra work it would before the office at this
time. J. Jeffers stated that all rides
should have insurance and have AERC as a named insured. S. Teeter stated that we are discussing two
different things: One is the motion
that we passed that AERC has to be an additional insured on the policy and that
ride managers have to have insurance for their rides. The other motion is an idea to have one insurance program to
cover all ride managers. C. Caudill
suggested that insurance issue be discussed at the Ride Managers meeting on
Friday. S. Kasemeyer moved to postpone
the insurance discussion until Sunday’s meeting; seconded by D. Jackson. Motion carried.. G. Williams abstained as she would not be in attendance at
Sunday’s meeting.
Policy Committee Report: S. Teeter stated the BOD needs to continue to raise awareness
regarding policies and procedures. J.
Parke stated that if AERC has a set of procedures that they are clearly defined
as procedures. S. Teeter read the final
report from the Ad hoc Policy Review Committee as follows: “ During the past 6
months several AERC members collected all available documents pertaining to
AERC policies and procedures. We converted the documents to electronic format
(pdf files, Word doc and html) and were then able to search, review and analyze
them. We reviewed all of the minutes from previous Board meetings, isolated
Board motions and directives and categorized them according to the type of
motion (e.g. rules, finance, competition, sanction) and also the validity or
status of the motion (e.g. resolved, unresolved, conflicting). We
cross-referenced existing documents such as handbooks and the 2000
Administrative Policy & Procedures manual. This required literally hundreds
of hours of combined effort. The work is archived on the AERC website (non-public)
and available for the current and future Boards if anybody else is ever crazy
enough to want to go there. The final ad hoc Policy Review Committee report
that is in your notebook contains: A Fire and Brimstone summary from Bob
Morris, who personally contributed an enormous amount of time to the effort; a
list of motions from 1990 to 2002 which contained directives from previous
Boards for action which was never taken, or in some way conflicts with existing
rules or written documents; a list of
motions from 1990 to 2002 that defined Rules changes or revisions that have not
yet been recorded in the current Rules document; a recommendation from the
committee to remand the above lists of motions to the appropriate committees
(e.g. rules, office, legal) and then be presented to the Board with committee
recommendations. The Board must have the final decision to either rescind these
previous motions, or to ask that they be moved forward. It is neither
responsible nor acceptable to ignore previous Board motions and resolutions; a
request that the AERC Administrative Policy & Procedures handbook be
revised so that it is current, and may be a useful reference to the Board of
Directors; a set of guidelines that we feel will help future Boards to do
business more efficiently and with greater assurance that individual
contributions will not be lost due to neglect, or changes in committee chairs,
office staff and AERC executive officers. In conclusion, this has been a most
interesting task. My overall impression upon studying 30 years of Board
meetings is that many talented and dedicated individuals have helped build AERC
and we have an organization to be proud of. It is also obvious that much of the
business of AERC is conducted in a rather spirited and spontaneous manner that
can sometimes lead to impulsive or ill-advised decisions. Looking forward, I
strongly urge the Board and future officers to place greater emphasis on (1)
Planning; (2) Clarity of motions presented to the Board; (3) Follow-through. I
ask that this Board accept the committee report as submitted, and specifically
the recommendation to remand the lists of unresolved motions to the appropriate
committees for review, and eventual determination by the Board.”
S.
Teeter asked that the Board to accept this report as submitted, specifically
the recommendations to remand the above lists of motions to the appropriate
committees and the committees to review and eventual termination by the Board.
S.
Teeter proposed the following motion:
“Whereas
the current procedure for review and approval of Special Event and Special
Qualification ride requests does not guarantee the opportunity for full Board
consideration of such requests; and
“Whereas
initial review of such requests should be made by the entire committee of
Sanctioning Directors to guarantee National as well as Regional consideration;
and
“Whereas
the timeliness of such requests can be expedited by eliminating the need for
full Board approval when there is a unanimous vote by the Sanctioning
Committee;
S.
Teeter moves that:
“The
AERC Board of Directors directs the Ride Managers Committee, The Sanctioning
Committee, the Legal and Bylaws and the Rules Committee to review and make
recommendations regarding the following:
“The
Sanctioning Committee shall initially receive all requests for Special Event
and Special Qualification rides and render a committee decision on the request
for sanctioning. If there is not a unanimous decision by the Sanctioning
Committee, the sanction request shall then go before the AERC Board for final
review and decision.
”Further,
the Board directs the Executive Director to publish in the May and June issues
of Endurance News, the original motion to modify the process of Special Event
and Special Qualification sanctioning as well as the
recommendations from the referenced committees. A final motion (original or
revised) will then be brought to the AERC Board for final consideration at the
Midyear AERC Board Meeting. If approved it will be effective for the
2004 ride season.” Seconded by M. Tomlinson. Discussion: J. Parke
indicated that the way this is structured it would take a bylaws change. Our bylaws define the sanctioning
committee. D. Barnett does not support
this motion because rides like Race of Champions or the big XP ride have such
an impact on all the other rides and all members in AERC and they should
require a vote of the full board. R.
Taylor favors moving this to a group of committees to talk about and come back to the Board. Motion carried. D. Barnett voted no.
Technical Committee: M. Maul reported that the
Tech Committee has accomplished the following:
On-line membership renewal; added a printable “members paid” feature;
official AERC listing of horse/rider availability from the members page; added
a targeted E-mail list mailing within the AERC; i.e., vets, ride mangers,
members who have not renewed. Percentages of people who access AERC
records: 53% bookmark the page, 40%
from AERC home page and 7% from Endurance.net. The Tech Committee is interested
in and working on putting Endurance News or a cut-down version on line. Overall rides are up 5% from last year; LD
rides are up 12% from last year, 50’s up 3%, 75’s up 2% and 100’s down 5%.
Sanctioning: V. Bowers stated that the
Sanctioning Committee appreciates the ability of Sanctioning Directors who
sanction on line. It has made our job a
lot easier. V. Bowers suggested that
Sanctioning Directors train the ride managers in their area to use on-line
sanctioning.
Special Sanctioning: The following are rides that
have special sanctioning requirements:
(1) Glass Mountain, June 13, 14, 15, 2003, three-day (50-50-55),
pioneer. V. Bowers has approved the
ride as local Sanctioning Director.
Unanimously approved. (2)
Midwest Mountain Quest ride, October 3, 4, 5, 2003, three-day (55, 50, 50),
pioneer. L. Riedel has approved as
local Sanctioning Director; V. Bowers approved as Special Sanctioning
Director. Unanimously approved. (3)
Western States Trail Ride has a special qualification this year. The special qualification
is: “Riders entering Western States Trail Ride must have completed at least 150
competitive distance miles on rides of 50 miles or more. This experience requirement can be met by
having previously completed the Western States Trail Ride or 150 miles of rides
50 miles or longer sanctioned by AERC, NATRC or other recognized organizations.
These qualifications apply to the rider only, not the horse.” Approved by M. Stover as local Sanctioning
Director and approved by V. Bowers as Special Sanctioning Director. (4) XP 2004 beginning in Virginia City, NV
on June 21, 2004 and ending in Rush Creek, Nebraska on July 24, 2004. There are a total of 25 days of riding a
distance of 50 miles a day (five days and four days and one week three days of
which one day was 55 miles). This
qualifies for a Pioneer ride. Comments: J. Parke asked to abstain from consideration
for reasons of potential conflict of interest.
D. Barnett believes this ride has too much of an effect on points. It allows one individual to be able to go to
this ride and stack their points for the year.
D. Barnett does not approve of it for anything other than a mileage only
ride. S. Kasemeyer stated she felt it
has an effect on all multi-day rides that are occurring at the same time. R. Taylor approves of this ride and does not
believe it will affect his ride. S.
Teeter approves. It is limited to 60
riders. M. Burton approves of the ride
for mileage only. Jan S. approves for
mileage only. T. Woolley Howe called
for a roll call vote. 12 in favor – 11
against. Roll Call Vote carried. Roll Call Vote: S. Teeter yes; P. Pizzo no; C. Caudill no; R. Ribley yes; M.
Burton no; V. Bowers yes; D. Frazier yes; S. Eichelberger yes; M. Maul yes; J.
Parke abstain; M. Tomlinson yes; J. Stevens no; L. Reidel no; D. Jackson yes;
T. Woolley Howe yes; G. Williams yes; D. Barnett no; S. Kasemeyer no; R. Taylor
yes; J. Jeffers yes; R. Eiland abstain; B. Hart yes. 13 in favor of sanctioning the XP 2004; 7 against and 2
abstentions – Motion to sanction approved.
Workshop: J. Parke reported there will be workshops
dealing with horse fatalities on Friday and Saturday, March 14 and 15, 2003 at
7 a.m. for one and a half hours. New
horse fatality reports will be incorporated as part of the minutes from now
on.
The
horse fatalities reports received as of the SLC midyear BOD meeting are as
follows: (1) “August 20, 2002 To: Kathleen Henkel, Executive Director, AERC,
From: AERC Veterinary Committee, RE:
Horse Fatality – Idaho Spuds Ride, 6/22/02. Dear Executive Director:
The Veterinary Committee has reviewed the information concerning this
fatality. No specific management or
veterinary circumstances have been identified that may have prevented this
fatality. Conditions at the ride did
not seem extreme although uumidity was reported to be medium to high and there
was a moderate to severe climb in the trail.
The rider was not the owner of the horse. The rider recognized the horse was not drinking well on the last
loop and walked the horse in the last – 8 miles and completed the ride. It was after that when the horse developed
signs of colic and treatment was started.
In retrospect, this case points to the need for riders to be familiar
with their mounts, their level of fitness and their drinking habits. It also points out that endurance riding has
risks for the horses and that riders need to be aware of those risks. Continued rider education is indicated. Respectfully, AERC Veterinary Committee,
Jamie Kerr DVM, Chairman.” (2) “June 29, 2002, TO: Executive Director, Kathleen Henckel, AERC, From: AERC Veterinary Committee, RE: Two horse fatalities, February 15, 2002, Cow
Tanks Ride. Dear Executive
Director: The Veterinary Committee has
reviewed the information concerning the death of two horses at the Cow Tanks
ride on February 15, 2002. No specific
circumstances that may have lead to these deaths have been identified therefore
no information that may be helpful in preventing future deaths has been
found. Respectfully, AERC Veterinary
Committee, Jamie Kerr DVM, Chiarman.”
The
horse fatalities reports received as of the March 13, 2003 BOD meeting are as
follows: (1) “August 20, 2002 To: Kathleen Henkel, Executive Director, AERC. From:
AERC Veterinary Committee.
Re: Horse Fatality – Tevis Cup
Ride 7/20/02. Dear Executive
Director: The Veterinary Committee has
reviewed the information concerning this fatality. No specific management or veterinary circumstances have been
identified that may have prevented this fatality. This fatality involved a horse that fell off the trail, in the
dark, and suffered a fractured neck.
The rider was not injured.
Although no specific management circumstances may have prevented this incident,
the WSTF organization will be considering ways to prevent future similar
accidents. Respectfully, AERC
Veterinary Committee, Jamie Kerr DVM, Chairman.” (2) “February 19, 2003.
To: Kathleen Henkle, Executive
Director, AERC. From: AERC Veterinary Committee. RE:
Horse Fatality – Colfax Rush 1, 7/28/02. Dear Executive Director:
The Veterinary Committee has reviewed the information concerning this
fatality. No specific management or
veterinary circumstances have been identified that may have prevented this
fatality. Conditions on this ride did
not seem extreme although the ambient temperature and humidity did vary during
the day. Both horse and rider were
experienced. The horse and rider
finished the ride and passed the final vet exam prior to the onset of colic
symptoms (-1 hr post ride exam). The
horse was treated at the ride sight (sic) and ultimately referred to a surgery
facility where he was euthanized following a diagnosis of a ruptured stomach.
Respectfully, AERC Veterinary Committee, Jamie Kerr DVM, Chairman.” (3)
“February 19, 2003. To: Kathleen Henkle, Executive Director,
AERC. From: AERC Veterinary Committee.
RE: Horse fatality – East Bay
Ride 9/14/02. Dear Executive Director,
The Veterinary Committee has reviewed the information concerning this
fatality. No specific management or
veterinary circumstances have been identified that may have prevented this
fatality. This tragic accident occurred
the night before the ride. The horse, a
stallion, broke out of his plastic portable pen about 3 a.m. Police found him later on a nearby
road. He had sustained a fractured left
humerus ad was euthanized. No information
was provided regarding the experience of this horse with this portable
corral. This fatality points out that
all aspects of horse care is important, including their stabling arrangement
while at a ride. Making certain they
are familiar and comfortable with restraint/stabling methods before going to a
ride can be critical…even then accidents can occur. Rider education about all aspects of horse safety is
indicated. Respectfully, AERC
Veterinary Committee, Jamie Kerr DVM, Chairman.” (4) “February 19, 2003. To:
Kathleen Henkle, Executive Director, AERC. From: AERC Veterinary
Committee. RE: Horse fatality – River Run Ride
1/16/02. Dear Executive Director, The
Veterinary Committee has reviewed the information concerning this
fatality. No specific management or
veterinary circumstances have been identified that may have prevented this
fatality. This fatality resulted when
about 40 miles into the ride the horse placed its foot under a root in the
trail and fractured the right radius bone.
This is essentially a fatal injury and the horse was euthanized. The information did not indicate a difficult
trail or severe footing. Experience of
horse and rider were not reported. In
the course of a 50 mile ride there are many obstacles for horse and rider to
negotiate. Unfortunately this type of
“mis-step’ occasionally occurs.
Respectfully, AERC Veterinary Committee, Jamie Kerr DVM, Chairman.”
Awards/National Awards Sponsorship: D. Jackson reported that the
Awards committee reviewed all existing descriptive documents referencing the
AERC Awards program. There are
inconsistencies between descriptions in the Endurance News, office Awards document
and 2000 AERC Administrative Policies and Procedures’ Manual. D. Jackson made a motion to approve wording
changes in the Bill Thornburgh Family Award and Julie and Bob Suhr Husband
& Wife Award. J. Parke made an amendment to D. Jackson’s motion. Amendement by J. Parke is as follows: “Remand the whole Awards package the Board
received back to the Awards Committee, Legal Committee and Rules Committee to
review the wording and handle this at the midyear meeting.” Seconded by S. Teeter. Amendment carried. J. Parke then called for
the question. Motion as amended
carried.
Rules
Committee: R. Eiland reported that the motion made by Maggy Price at the
midyear meeting was remanded back to the Rules Committee for rewording. The idea of the motion was a rider would
have six hours to complete a trail and then an additional 30 minutes to recover
at the finish of the ride. The newest
modified version of L5 is as follows:
“L5.1 There may be no minimum time limit for completion. L5.2
Competition time will be according to the Limited Distance chart in Appendix
A. L5.3 Riding time is the time used by
competitors to finish the course,
excluding all hold times L5.4 Ride Time of the competitor ends upon
crossing the designated finish line, but
placing will be determined by the time the pulse criteria is met. To receive a completion the equine must reach a preset veterinary
criteria of 60 heartbeats per minute or less within 30 minutes of the
competitors finish time, and satisfy all other completion criteria within one
hour of arrival at the finish. There is
a marked finish line on the course that is used to determine the finish of
the course.” S. Kasemeyer moved to
change the rules as they stand to allow Limited Distance to have six hours for
25 miles plus 30 minutes to reach criteria for completion. C. Caudill commented
that it is closer to what the criteria is for the 50 miler. D. Frazier asked if the above wording had
been placed in two issues of the Endurance News for notification of the
membership and then receive comments on the changes and take it up at the next
Board meeting. J. Parke agrees with D.
Frazier’s comments. J. Parke likes the
rule the way it is presently. M.
Tomlinson would like to see more comments come in from membership. S. Kasemeyer, R. Taylor and G. Williams
stated their regions wanted to leave the rule as it is. J.Parke called for the
question. Motion to cut off debate and
vote on motion carried. Motion
defeated.
Motions from the Rules Committee: The Rules Committee was asked to modify Rule 2.1.8 and Rule L2.1.8 to reflect the method of reporting horse fatalities as voted on at the BOD Midyear 2001 meeting. “Rule 2.1.8 and L2.1.8 – Equines that die at rides shall be reported by the Ride Manager with the ride results. The ride veterinarian will report treatments and fatalities to the AERC office within two weeks of the ride date. This information will be kept permanently on file at the AERC office.” Discussion: D. Frazier feels that since there is another motion coming up on Sunday by J. Parke relating to the same subject that this is superfluous. J. Parke stated the proposed rule change is ambiguous. S. Teeter made a motion to remand the above rule to the Veterinarian Committee and Rules Committee for further revision. Seconded by D. Barnett. Motion carried.
R. Eiland stated that J. Baldwin made a motion that was remanded
to the committee to replace in Rule 11.2.1. the words “pre-vet exam” with the
words “pre-ride vet exam.” The Rules
Committee makes the motion to replace the wording. Motion carries.
The Rules Committee makes a
motion to clean up the typos in the following rules:
1) “L1.2.7 In order for a rider to elevate, the
equine being ridden must meet the age requirements for the distance he is
elevating into as stated in Rules 3
and L3. (currently only refers to #3)”
2) “L7 If placements are given, they must be
determined using the procedure described in L5.3 and L5.4.
The ride results will be posted in this order, but no points for placement or
for completion will be awarded.” (currently refers to 5.3 and 5.4)
3)
“L9.3 Under the AERC system, all of the first ten finishing horses are
eligible for consideration, whether ridden by a junior, featherweight,
lightweight, middleweight, or heavyweight riders. Keep in mind that the
order of finish for Limited Distance riders is determined using recovery time
as described in rule L5.4” (currently refers
to rule 5.4). Motion carries.
Limited
Distance: G.
Williams reported that the LD Committee is putting together a poll and will
have it put on line as well as in the Endurance News. LD seems to be the biggest growing segment of our sport.
Rule recommendation from T. Woolley Howe regarding
Rule 8.8 with respect to regional points only that at least 20% of miles must
be completed in the member’s own region.
At the end of the ride year, all regional points from the last rides
accrued which are above the 80% outside region mileage level will be eliminated
until a 20/80 mileage ratio is achieved. S. Teeter read a petition from the
Northwest Region. It stated, “We the
undersigned members of the Pacific Northwest Endurance Riders believe that
before a rider can be eligible to receive an AERC Regional Award that rider
must compete in no less than one competition and physically reside in that
area.” T. Woolley Howe withdrew the
motion.
Legal &
Bylaws/P&G: J. Parke reported that with the adoption of the Bylaws in 2002 there
were complaints about the definition of “Regular Member.” This motion will have to have a two-third
vote approving it by the BOD, then will go to the membership for their
two-thirds approval.
Whereas,
the AERC adopted new Bylaws in 2002; and
Whereas,
Section 5.02(a) of Article V Membership of the AERC Bylaws defines
"Regular Member" to require U.S. or Canadian citizenship; and
Whereas,
both AERC Directors and Members have expressed an interest in allowing people
who are permanent residents of the U.S. and Canada for immigration law
purposes to be Regular Members of the AERC with the same
right to vote and serve on the Board as citizens;
J.
Parke moved that the AERC Board of Directors amend Section 5.02(a) of Article V
Membership of the Bylaws to read as follows:
"a) "Regular Member". A Member who is a citizen or resident alien of the
United States of America or Canada , and who holds no other membership in the
Conference shall be a Regular Member. " Seconded by M. Maul. Motion carried. M. Maul asked that the office wait to send this out as Joe long is circulating a petition for minimum age for junior riders so both can be sent at the same time. K. Henkel noted.
J.
Parke moved on behalf of the Legal Committee the following:
Whereas,
the AERC is now running a surplus of income over expenses in excess of $125,000
annually, over $20 per member per year, and has amassed unspent revenue in
recent years of several hundred thousand dollars over and above the amounts
necessary to operate the organization at current spending levels; and
Whereas, there currently are no restrictions whatsoever on the expenditure of
these funds by the AERC Board and/or Executive Committee; and
Whereas, the surplus funds are currently invested along with all other AERC
funds in low interest bearing money market accounts typically earning less than
one percent interest per year even though Certificates of Deposit at the same
institutions earn two to three times as much; and
Whereas, the AERC has relatively little or no money set aside to fund to
support trails, education and veterinary research, even though promotion of
those activities is included among the purposes of the AERC under its bylaws;
J. Parke moved that the AERC:
1) Immediately establish a separate fund known as the AERC Restricted
Reserve Fund;
2) Immediately deposit the sum of $200,000 into the Fund and augment the
Fund with an additional amount each year from then current annual
revenues. This additional amount shall be within a range of 15% to 85% of
the projected net operating income for that year and shall be determined by the
Board taking into account the specific circumstances of the AERC's financial
condition at that time;
3) Invest the Fund in investments of a more long term character, such as
CD's, than the money market accounts in which AERC operating funds are
currently invested;
4) Restrict expenditures from principal within the Fund to expenditures
for emergency purposes or extraordinary capital expenses only;
5) Use the interest generated by the Fund to spend on programs for
trails, education and veterinary research to be developed and/or approved by
the AERC.
Seconded
by S. Kasemeyer. T. Woolley Howe
pointed out to the Board that the reason we have this surplus money is that we
have not spent any of it. M. Tomlinson
stated that the motion just says to put this surplus money in something that
will earn higher interest. D. Barnett
agreed with M. Tomlinson that it should be put in a higher earning interest
account. D. Frazier is it possible that
the BOD could do it in the same way we have without restricting it. When L. Kanavy was treasurer this BOD
invested in staggered CD’s. Motion carried.
J. Parke’s next motion has to do with cleanup of Bylaws. Our current Bylaws give the Executive Committee an unlimited grant of power. This motion will establish some limits for the Executive Committee.
Whereas, the
provisions of our new bylaws governing the Executive Committee of the Board of
Directors, Section 11.01(a) of Article 11, state:
'The Executive Committee shall, between meetings of the Board, exercise
the duties and
functions of the Board within the limits set down by the
Board,
though in any case the Executive Committee shall not reverse any
prior decision of
the Board.'
Whereas,
under our new bylaws the Executive Committee has almost the same authority the
Board does except as restricted by what limits we as the Board establish.
Since the Board only meets twice a year, leaving the field open
to the Executive Committee most of the time; and
Whereas, the Board has not established any limits on
Executive Committee authority after the passage of the new bylaws.
J. Parke moved that the Board
limit the authority of the Executive Committee's authority to act on behalf of
the Board and the AERC, effective immediately, as follows:
1) The Executive Committee shall
not authorize single expenditures or series of related expenditures, or entry
into any contract for purchase or rental of personal or real property or hiring
of services, in an amount in excess of
$5,000;
2) The Executive Committee may handle personnel matters when necessary but
shall not hire or fire the Executive Director nor shall it set overall salary
levels for the AERC's employees;
3) The Executive Committee may approve Special Sanctioning requests
when necessary but shall not Specially
Sanction new events which have not
previously been approved by the Board;
4) The Executive Committee may clarify existing awards for endurance
riding when necessary but shall not
establish new awards nor shall it modify existing awards;
5) The Executive Committee shall
not amend, add to or revoke any of the AERC Rules nor shall it establish
"policies" governing AERC operations.
6) No meeting of the Executive Committee shall take place without
at least 48 hour prior notification (e.g. mail, fax, phone) to the members of
the Board of all agenda items to be considered. Only those agenda items, which
have been
so announced may be considered.
Seconded by M. Tomlinson. Discussion: J. Parke stated that this is a directive, not a Bylaw change. D. Frazier stated he feels very strongly that something like this needs to be done. The Executive Committee has taken undue license with what our Bylaws allowed them to do on several issues over the past four years and there was no retribution for doing so. D. Frazier stated that if he were going to add something to this motion it would be you put in things the EC cannot do and you put in things the EC can do. J. Parke stated that the EC can act for the Board between meetings. D. Frazier stated that the Bylaws state, “The EC shall between meetings of the board exercise the duties and functions of the Board within the limits set down by the Board.” D. Frazier stated that the limits he sets down as a Board is that you do not have the authority of an EC to do anything unless I grant you the power to do it. D. Frazier stated that we have executive boards that until recently have met and made decisions, things have been done our behalf that we did not authorize them to do and we did not even have the minutes as to how the vote went and who did what or anything. M. Tomlinson stated that the EC should totally act in an emergency. D. Frazier stated that he wanted the language that came out of the old Bylaws specifically put into the new Bylaws. S. Teeter stated the BOD can do telephone conference calling now as it is relatively inexpensive. T. Woolley Howe called for the question. Seconded by S. Teeter. Motion to call for the question carried, D. Frazier voted no. T. Woolley Howe asked for a roll call vote. Seconded by R. Eiland. Motion to have roll call carried. Roll call vote as follows: S. Teeter yes; P. Pizzo yes; C. Caudill abstain; R. Ribley yes; M. Burton no; V. Bowers no; D. Frazier no; S. Eichelberger yes; M. Maul yes; J. Parke yes; M. Tomlinson yes; J. Stevens yes; L. Reidel yes; D. Jackson yes; T. Woolley Howe yes; G. Williams yes; D. Barnett no; S. Kasemeyer yes; R. Taylor yes; J. Jeffers yes; R. Eiland yes; B. Hart yes. 17 in favor, 4 against. Motion carried.
J. Parke stated that at the midyear meeting
he conducted a workshop that dealt with horse fatalities. Our of this workshop he is proposing the
following motion:
"Whereas, endurance ride related
horse fatalities is a problem which continues to deeply concern members of the
AERC and members of the Board of Directors, and threatens the positive public
perception of our sport; and
Whereas, the AERC needs more information than it currently receives in order to
evaluate horse fatalities; and
Whereas, our current procedures call for the receipt of horse fatality reports
only from the head veterinarian of a ride where a horse fatality occurs, even
though it would be more useful to have reports also from the rider, the ride
manager and the treating veterinarian; and
Whereas, our current procedures are unclear as to what is considered a horse
fatality and appear to only address horse deaths occurring at a ride, when it
is believed that some ride related fatalities occur days or weeks after a
ride without notice to the AERC; and
Whereas, the issue of requiring reports on horse fatalities from treating
veterinarians and riders raises serious confidentiality issues; and
Whereas, the AERC should require riders and/or owners of horses who die to
waive any confidentiality rights concerning their treating veterinarians so
that adequate information may be collected by the AERC; and
Whereas, it is recognized that key sources of information about specific horse
fatalities, particularly treating veterinarians, will be reluctant to provide
information if their reports will be made public, and may not
co-operate if their reports are to be made public; and
Whereas, AERC members are often eager to know the results of any AERC
investigation of particular horse fatalities and should have the access to
official AERC Veterinary Committee horse fatality reports received by the
Board; and
Whereas, the AERC needs improved procedures for effectively collecting
meaningful information on horse fatalities and rules which allow those
procedures to be effectively implemented.
J. Parke moved that:
I. The AERC Executive Director and Legal Committee be instructed to immediately
develop modifications to existing horse fatality investigation procedures to
require:
A. Horse fatality reports be required for fatalities
for any horse which has died within 15 days following an endurance ride in
which that horse was entered.
B. Horse fatality witness statements be submitted not
only by the head ride veterinarian, but also the rider and/or owner and the
ride manager (at least about general conditions of the ride as well as any
relevant direct observations of the ride manager) and be requested of the
treating veterinarian, and that appropriate forms for these statements be
prepared.
C. All witness statements collected by the AERC for
purposes of reporting on horse fatalities, including statements from the head
veterinarian, treating veterinarian, ride manager and rider and/or owner, be
immediately transmitted to the AERC Veterinary Committee for its review, but
otherwise be held in confidence; and
D. Board members to refrain from demanding copies of confidential witness
statements notwithstanding their statutory rights of inspection, in order to
encourage full disclosure of relevant information by witnesses concerned about
confidentiality, except that the Executive Committee and Legal Committee
Chairperson shall have access to witness statements as needed to verify their
receipt and consideration by the Veterinary Committee; and
E. The official Veterinary Committee report on any horse
fatality received by the Board be made available to members on request (with
any appropriate copying charge) and be published in Endurance News; and
F. The modified investigation procedures to be developed
under this motion are intended to gather information for the management of
horses at endurance rides only and are not intended to judge the practices of
treating
veterinarians for post ride care.
II. The Legal Committee and Rules Committee be direct to develop any
appropriate rules to require rider and/or owners of horses, as a condition of
entry in AERC sanctioned rides, which die within 15 days after participation
in an AERC sanctioned endurance ride to waive any rights to hold treatment
records of the treating veterinarian confidential and which require the rider
and/or owners of any such horses which die within 15 days after participation
in an endurance ride to immediately give notice of the death to the AERC and
co-operate in it's investigative procedures.
III. The modification to horse fatality report procedures be reviewed by Board
members for consideration by the Executive Committee as soon as practicably
possible and the modification to rules be considered by the full
Board at it's next meeting.
Motion
seconded by T. Woolley Howe. S. Teeter
and C. Caudill asked that this motion go before the Veterinary Committee for
their review. D. Barnett stated he
could not support this motion as stated because there is currently a fatality
reporting procedure in place. R. Taylor
stated this is a good starting place for Friday and Saturday’s workshop on this
subject. J. Parke asked to postpone this motion until Sunday. After more
discussion on this matter, J. Parke asked for the BOD to think about this
motion. J. Parke would like to get
feedback from the members at the Friday and Saturday workshop and discuss it on
Sunday. J. Parke moved to postpone until Sunday Board Meeting. Seconded by T. Woolley Howe. Motion carried.
Debora Sanger
Issue: J.
Parke conducted an open hearing regarding Deborah Sanger. Deborah Sanger was not present at the
hearing; however, she did submit a rebuttal letter in her defense. The
potential outcomes up for vote are as follows:
Vote to suspend, vote to terminate, or vote to not do any of those
things or vote to remand this to the Protest and Grievance Committee. R. Eiland, J. Stevens, Judda Schmidt
presented their case. Other Board
members gave statements who had dealings with D. Sanger. R. Eiland, Jan
Stevens, and Judda Schmidt are made a motion to: “Have Debora Sanger’s membership
in AERC terminated or suspended beginning now for a period of 12 months. If she is not a member of AERC, she will not
be allowed to rejoin AERC for a period of 12 months as of this date, and in
addition we do not want her to be able to enter an AERC event or any equine
owned by her to enter an AERC event during that 12-month period. At the end of the one-year suspension
period, she may be allowed to rejoin AERC upon reimbursement of any debts
incurred at any AERC event and that are on record with the AERC office.” J.
Parke moved to defer the motion until the Sunday meeting. Seconded by R. Taylor. Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:35 a.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Jeffers
Secretary
Minutes approved as amended 5/6/03 during Board
Conference Call.